|
[ Country-by-Country Reports ]
HUNGARY (TIER 2)
[Extracted from U.S. State Dept Trafficking in Persons Report, June 2009]
Hungary
is a source, transit, and destination country for women trafficked from Romania
and Ukraine to and through Hungary to the Netherlands, the United Kingdom,
Denmark, Germany, Austria, Italy, Switzerland, France, and the United Arab
Emirates for the purpose of commercial sexual exploitation. Experts noted a
significant increase in trafficking within the country, mostly women from
eastern Hungary trafficked to Budapest and areas along the Austrian border.
Roma women and girls who grow up in Hungarian orphanages are highly
vulnerable to internal sex trafficking.
The
Government of Hungary does not fully comply with the minimum standards for
the elimination of trafficking; however, it is making significant efforts to
do so. Although Hungary sustained efforts in certain areas to combat
trafficking in persons, it did not demonstrate the appreciable progress over
the previous year contemplated by the minimum standards in the Trafficking
Victims Protection Act. While the government’s anti-trafficking hotline
referred an increased number of victims for assistance and the police implemented
a new trafficking database to help improve victim identification, the
government’s overall efforts to combat trafficking declined in 2008.
The
government did not provide funding to NGOs for victim assistance and
protection and caused one NGO to close its trafficking shelter -- one of only
two in the country -- when it cancelled the lease for the government-owned
building in which the shelter was housed. While the government offered
alternative shelter space to the NGO, the location of the proposed facility was
too remote to be practical and provide adequate assistance to victims.
Hungary conducted no trafficking prevention efforts until the end of the
reporting period when it began a three-month campaign focused on demand
reduction in March 2009. In April 2008, the government adopted a national
strategy, creating a national coordinator to coordinate all anti-trafficking
efforts and to create an anti-trafficking national action plan; however, the
national coordinator did not have its first meeting until February 2009 and
the government appeared to do very little to implement the strategy during
the reporting period.
Recommendations for Hungary: Increase funding to NGOs providing victim assistance and
protection; continue sensitivity training for patrol officers to ensure
proactive victim identification and appropriate, humane treatment of
identified victims; increase the number of victims referred by police for
assistance; increase the number of trafficking investigations and continue to
ensure the majority of convicted traffickers serve some time in prison;
conduct campaigns to reduce domestic demand for commercial sex acts; and
increase general trafficking awareness efforts by warning vulnerable
populations about the dangers of both sex and labor trafficking.
Prosecution
The Hungarian government’s law enforcement efforts were mixed during
the reporting period. Hungary prohibits all forms of trafficking through
Paragraph 175/b of its criminal code, though prosecutors rely on other
trafficking-related statutes to prosecute most trafficking cases. Penalties
prescribed in Paragraph 175/b range from one to 15 years’ imprisonment,
which are sufficiently stringent and commensurate with those prescribed for
other grave crimes, such as rape. Police and border guards conducted 21
trafficking investigations, a significant drop from 48 investigations in
2007. Authorities prosecuted 18 traffickers in 2008, compared with 20 in
2007. Convictions were obtained against 18 traffickers in 2008—16 for
sex trafficking and two for labor trafficking—compared with 17 total
convictions in 2007. In 2008, seven of 18 convicted traffickers received
suspended sentences and served no time in prison compared to 2007 when only
one convicted trafficker received a suspended sentence. During the reporting
period, four traffickers were sentenced to up to three years’
imprisonment, one trafficker was sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment,
one trafficker was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment, and five
traffickers were sentenced to five to nine years’ imprisonment. In
2008, the government provided victim sensitivity and treatment training for
15 judges, as well as victim identification training for crisis hotline
operators. In January 2009, Hungarian and French authorities successfully
disrupted an international sex trafficking ring and identified as many as 100
victims.
Protection
Hungary significantly decreased its victim assistance efforts during the
reporting period. In 2008, the government provided no funding for NGOs
providing victim assistance including shelter, medical care, legal
assistance, and psychological counseling; in 2007, the government provided
$150,000 for victim assistance. In June 2008, the government cancelled the
lease for a government-owned building which housed one of only two trafficking
shelters in the country. While the government offered an alternative facility
space for the shelter, the location was too remote to adequately assist
victims. During the reporting period, 88 trafficking victims were identified
and assisted by NGOs, compared to 45 victims assisted in 2007. The
government-run trafficking hotline referred 50 victims to NGOs for
assistance, up from 37 victims referred for assistance by government
officials in 2007. Law enforcement and consular officials identified approximately
26 victims domestically and abroad in 2008. Victims were not penalized for
acts committed as a direct result of being trafficked and there were no
reported cases of authorities’ mistreatment of trafficking victims. The
government encouraged victims to assist with trafficking investigations and
prosecutions; however, no victims assisted law enforcement during the
reporting period. The government offered foreign victims a 30-day reflection
period to decide whether to assist law enforcement; however, no victims
applied for or received the 30-day temporary residency permits in 2008.
Victims may apply for a six-month temporary residency permit if they choose
to cooperate with law enforcement; there was no data available on the number
of permits granted to trafficking victims during the reporting period.
Prevention
Hungary demonstrated no increased efforts to prevent incidents of human
trafficking throughout the year. The government did not conduct any
anti-trafficking information or education campaigns during most of the
reporting period. The government took limited measures to reduce the demand
for commercial sex acts during this reporting period. In March 2009, at the
end of the reporting period, the government began a three-month campaign
focused on demand reduction. Hungary actively monitored immigration and
emigration patterns for evidence of trafficking. During the year, the
government provided anti-trafficking training to Hungarian troops prior to
their deployment for international peacekeeping missions.
|